Re: [ProgSoc] PINE Being Free?

[Anand Kumria <wildfire@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au>]

On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:50:14AM +1000, Nicholas FitzRoy-Dale wrote:
> At 11:34am on the 18th of April, Matt wrote:
> 
> > the GPL doesnt necessarily fall under "free of charge,
> > non-proprietary, or shareware".
> 
> Maybe you have a strange idea about "non-proprietary", but how could GPLed
> software be proprietary? From http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html:

I suspect Matt was talking more about GPL software being charged for. Like, you
know, Redhat do.

Anand

-- 
 `` We are shaped by our thoughts, we become what we think.
 When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never
 leaves. '' -- Buddha, The Dhammapada

-
You are subscribed to the progsoc mailing list. To unsubscribe, send a
message containing "unsubscribe" to progsoc-request@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au.
If you are having trouble, ask owner-progsoc@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au for help.