Re: [ProgSoc] PINE Being Free?

[Nicholas FitzRoy-Dale <wzdd@nospam.lardcave.net>]

At 3:35pm on the 19th of April, Anand Kumria wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:31:46AM +1000, Nicholas FitzRoy-Dale wrote:
> > At 10:12pm on the 17th of April, Anand Kumria wrote:
> >
> > > Using the same liblockfile library to ensure NFS works okay. Having a version
> > > of pine in /usr/bin/ is a violation of the licence!
> >
> > There is nothing in the Pine license that prevents installation in /usr/bin.
>
> You can not distribute a version of Pine that is installed in /usr/bin.

This is kind of nonsensical so I am assuming you mean "you can not
distribute a version of Pine that assumes its helper programs are installed
in /usr/bin", in which case yes, that's right. You would need to compile
your own copy onsite.

- Nicholas FitzRoy-Dale
http://www.lardcave.net

Q: Can I have a conversation with you?
A: Have two, they're small!
- http://gs72.sp.cs.cmu.edu/cgi-bin/cube-hof.html




-
You are subscribed to the progsoc mailing list. To unsubscribe, send a
message containing "unsubscribe" to progsoc-request@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au.
If you are having trouble, ask owner-progsoc@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au for help.